data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f2b/06f2b1254f03337714b29c83dcc991dbb5868740" alt="Camworks adding a machine"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfcac/dfcac551c2c1a3294b4aba9cce240ecd0b1afc03" alt="camworks adding a machine camworks adding a machine"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/432c8/432c86fed81b9340a194ce8994598a4d9aa55eb0" alt="camworks adding a machine camworks adding a machine"
A drawing with asymmetrical tolerance ranges. Figure 1 shows a drawing that he encountered, in which a hole diameter was defined as 1.5 in with a tolerance range of +0.0035 to -0.005 in, along with other asymmetrical tolerance requirements.įigure 1. Prashant Kulkarni shared his experiences with GE Power and Water. If you are a designer, where would you specify asymmetrical tolerances? If you are a machinist, how would you handle asymmetrical tolerances?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2990/a29904b9efaaf97d8e85dedf87c6993f26f0bb9e" alt="camworks adding a machine camworks adding a machine"
I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comment area below. Have you ever defined asymmetrical tolerance requirements in your designs? Does this type of tolerances look familiar? A nominal width size of 110 mm with a tolerance range from+0.15 to -0.25 mm, or a nominal hole diameter of 85 mm with a unilateral tolerance window of -0.05 to -0.25 mm, requiring both limits on the smaller side of the nominal diameter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f2b/06f2b1254f03337714b29c83dcc991dbb5868740" alt="Camworks adding a machine"